Search warrant reveals VA Tech killer had no video games
Gaming Features
By Casey Lynch Apr 20, 2007, 14:37 GMT
Older Talkback
page: 1
vidoe games do not suck
video games do not cause people to do crazy things
Any Fa**ot that thinks game cause shootings at school should die
video games are not the cause its the way the person is being treated at school is the cause
video games do not cause people to kill, as does a gun does not kill a person. there may be some games that have violence in it, but that could hardly be considered promoting it.
As silly as the 'violent video games cause school shootings' argument is, the defense of those video games by games enthusiasts is about as blind and stubborn as the defense of guns by the pro-gun lobby.
And I think you're jumping the gun here. You take a list of items recovered from his room and because 'video games' are not specifically mentioned, you assume that he had none? What about his desktop computer? What about those compact discs?
I think the sensitivity and defensiveness of the gaming community when events like these occur really demonstrates the fact that you all know that these games have a greater effect on players than you will want to admit.
'And I think you're jumping the gun here. You take a list of items recovered from his room and because 'video games' are not specifically mentioned, you assume that he had none? What about his desktop computer? What about those compact discs?'
I'm suprised that nobody else has asked that yet. When i got to the 'computer' part of the search list, i was wondering if the police has went on it and searched the hard drive. I'm sure they might find something there to there liking.
Cho was clincally depressed though, so thoughts of harm to himself or to others would have came eventually.
But i still would like to protect the notion that violent video games do not cause acts of violence. Even if Cho played violent video games, i think the enviroment he grew up in may have been a bigger harm to him than the game itself. The media described him as a 'Loner' and a person that had no friends. Maybe the fact that he didn't have anybody to turn to was the cause of this. Perhaps he was too afraid of the truth, and started using other people as his 'hate scapegoat'.
Meh, thats my thoughts.
Correction:
Counter-Strike was a fan-created 'mod' for Valve's 1998 game Half-Life. After Counter-Strike's enormous success, Valve bought the mod's development team and hired its staff. Counter-Strike: Source was developed by this team and Valve using the technology behind Half-Life 2 (specifically its new graphics engine, called Source).
I really am tired about hearing about the VA Tech slaying or whatever the media wants to call it.
About a year ago now a man had taken hostages at an Amish school and had killed some students and then himself it hardly got mentioned. Does that make it okay?
What it does is send a compelling message about our culture and show us that only the high visibility tragedies will be the only ones that are relevant.
Personally I am pissed off about it all and am saddened by the incident. I don't think that it is fair to undermine things that happen in our own communities every day.
I bet that the guy who even suggested Counter Strike causes kids to go kill people is/was/has:
Religious in some way
Gay
Heavily Bullied at School
Never Even Played a computer game
Finds Barbie Video games 'Pornographic'
And by the way Counter Strike was origionally a Quake 1 Mod called Navy Seals, just thought i'd point that out.
Another thing i realised is that why is that guy blaming Microsoft, they have nothing to do with Valve or Counter Strike...
No need to be homophobic is there....
The only reason this story is lasting this long in the media so long is because the kid is asian. Every asian kid obviously plays violent videogames, and the fact that they didn't find any in his room should have sent up a red flag. I bet this kid would not have killed so many people in real life had he owned a copy of counter-strike, or if Steam didn't make it so hard to play for free, because he probably would have pirated it at some point.
The moral of this story is to buy a lonely kid some video games before it's too late.
Travo Cadavo,
The reason the VT shootings is making so much news is because it was at a college which people can relate to and are therefore personally affected by it. The Amish school, on the other hand, was, well, Amish. I don't know any Amish people, nor have I been to an Amish town, therefore it feels alien and somewhat disconnected from me. Yeah, it's sad that I don't feel the same about both tragedies, but it's the honest truth. We (well, most people) are more impacted by events that we can relate to.
It is ignorant to lay the blame entirely on video games, but you can't really blame Jack for his comments. While he is ignorant, egotistical and somewhat of a social vigilante, he is as much of product of our society as Cho was. He feels that someone should pay for the loss of life which he has seen in today's world. Video games are what he happens to put the blame on, because he is ignorant of what they really are, which is why he has no problem blaming them. For we, as humans, have always feared the unknown. That thing which goes bump in the night. If we knew what it was, we wouldn't be afraid. But we don't know, and all of those scary stories come back to us, when we are alone in the night. Video games are Jack Thompson's boogey-man. Pity him, because while his intentions are good, he is weakened by his fear of what he doesn't know.
Also, Cho may have played video games(Maybe even *violent* ones, god forbid, oh noes), but that didn't create what he was. From what I know, he was a reclusive person, who felt that the rich kids had it easy,(please, forgive me if I am misinformed) which had nothing to do with video games. His hate, and his passion against the other students was formed and tempered by the actions of individuals, even if they didn't mean to hurt him. It was a tragic event, and a production of a society which is beginning to decay.
But I have one final question. I noted that the President offered his condolences to the families of Virginia Tech, which was a thoughtful gesture. But why did he offer condolences for the 33 deaths of the students, (please don't take me wrong, I'm not trying to trivialize their deaths, only prove a point) and not see it fit to offer his condolences at the Station fire, where over a hundred people died? Was it because he wasn't so desperate to move up in the public opinion? Are his condolences just an assumed pose, to gain face with the general public? I'm sure he feels something, but perhaps his appearance was motivated by political reasons? If so, I am quickly losing faith in our government's morality.
Games do not make people violent, a bad upbringing, trauma and stress cause violence. If i walked up to you and put a gun in you hand what would you do? would you drop it? would you give it back to me? or would you kill me? What you decide to do with the gun is based on what your previous experiences have taught you not the fact i have just handed a gun to you. By giving you the gun i have given you the opportunity to do something bad weather or not you do it is up to you.
I play (and make) violent video games (oh no!) almost every day. I have no form of destructive behavior. I don't hate people, life, animals, society, anything. In fact I have a very hard time ending the life of an ant crawling across my kitchen floor.
I'm sorry, but solely blaming games for such a tragedy is wrong. There are many many more important factors involved.
Why is it so difficult for people to blame him?
After all he pulled the trigger, not some software designer or highschool bully.
The real problem here is that personal responsability is gone in this country because you can bet that all of those who are reaching for someone other than the shooter to blame are the first to find someone else to blame for their own problems.
excuse me wtf but you're not exactly creating a good argument for yourself there .... lol
I have completely lost interest in Dr. Phil's show now.
Jack Thompson, meanwhile, he's just trying to gather attention. Most of my friends are almost normal, and they play video games/watch violent television every day. I don't see Thompson trying to say that television is the cause of this, no. He just assumes this because apparently 'interactivity stirs emotions.'
If you're going to slander video games, THEN SAY SO IN A VIDEO GAME, IT MIGHT 'STIR' MORE EMOTION!
Idiot.
It's sad, but true. People can't accept responsibility for their own actions anymore, and thus do not expect other people to be responsible for theirs. It's always someone else's fault.
The facts are simple: Cho thought up the event. Cho bought the guns. Cho bought the ammunition. Cho walked around the school and pulled the triggers. Cho killed these people.
Blaming video games, blaming guns, blaming their creators... it's all a way to deflect the facts. This man, for whatever reason, went crazy and decided to kill people. The rest doesn't matter. Any sane individual could play violent games and own guns without ever going so far as to slaughtering innocent people. In fact, an overwhelming majority of them do just that. Why are we so obsessed with the minority here? Obviously, something is wrong with those people, that's why they kill others.
How hard is that to understand? How hard is it to place the blame where it is due?
Video games prevent crimes of all kinds. Boredom is a major factor in the level of crime in society. By giving people a vicarious outlet for boredom or unresolved negative emotions, and teaching players repeatedly that there is a consequence for errors in judgement, you're promoting a safe society. We see this kind of vicarious outlet taught in psychology as well, where it is commonly suggested someone who is angry should focus thier frustrations on inanimate objects such as a pillow, or counting to 10. As an avid gamer for years, and having seen the research on how crime has dropped the more popular video games have become, I have see every reason to find contention with the FBI and Dr. Phil, who probably only want to see video games taxed in a way not unlike cigarettes or gambling.
page: 1
Latest Headlines in Gaming
- 1. 2009 'Video Game Awards' nominees announced
- 2. 'Phoenix Wright Ace Attorney' series coming to WiiWare
- 3. Sony releases 'God of War Collection' for PS3
- 4. 'LittleBigPlanet' makes PSP debut
- 5. Nintendo Download Update: Pokemon Rumble
News from Other Sites
- The Tech Herald - Cinema Blend
Your Talkback on this Story